Chivalry Film Productions®

Meet the Parents, Meet the Fockers, Wedding Crashers and other movies in the industry are a product of "Stolen Federal Copyright Materials" originally created and owned by Joseph Ardito and stolen by the defendants/respondents "Organized Crime Syndicate" in a premeditated scheme of depriving this plaintiff/appellant of his federal protected copyrights.

The Judge in this case barred "discovery" even though the predated 1991 Meet the Parents videocassette was a "fraud" and planted by employees at the Library of Congress to wit: Tracie Coleman and Richard D. Sharp whom have both with premeditation and intent perjured affidavits  and tampered with federal evidence in an attempt of validating a pre-existing 1991 MTP videocassette that was a blatant fraud  that  had been planted.  These same employees were held responsible and liable for the copying of all the evidence  presented in this case.  This plaintiff appellant had over "35 pages" of federal protected copyrighted pages missing from one copyright and a number of pages missing from other copyrights. 

The judge based his decision by taking bits and pieces of evidence that formulated a bias  decision.  However, this decision  had been corrupted for a number of reasons.  The sabotaging  of the complaint  by attorneys from this plaintiff/appellant's same office, that had  contributed in the  formulation of  the complaint. These same attorneys are  linked directly to the  "theft ring" and "Organized Crime Syndicate".  

The judge in this case also relied on  bits and pieces of characters, scenes and settings stating that the defendants/respondents could have decontructed this plaintiff/appellants scenes however, whatever characters, scenes or settings that the judge  stated could be decontructed could easily be recontructed by this plaintiff/appellant if these same scenes, characters or settings were taken in "full". This  would actually prove "Verbatim Copying" and "Plagiarism" beyond any reasonable doubt in essence considering all the circumstances criminal copyright infringement. 

 The judge in this case or any judge in any other case  should not refer to this case Chivalry Film Productions, et al v. NBC Universal Inc, et al., 05-cv-5627 as a legal ruling because it has been manifested by crimes, frauds, felonies and corruption in the court system. 

Any judge using this case in an attempt of validating this decision  is trying to validate a decision that was manifestated by  frauds, crimes and corruption and is actually creating and relying on an  "Abomination Of  The Law". 
 
The alleged 1991 Meet the Parents predated videocassette copyright is "not credible" it had been tampered and planted part of a scheme used unlawfully by the defendants attorneys with the intent of manipulating and distorting the decisions in this case that would bar discovery in essence protecting this "Organized Crime Syndicate" and its members. 
                       
                              The Facts
                 "Organized Crime Syndicate"  

       1. Gregg Glienna and Mary Ruth Clarke the alleged owners of the 1991 MTP Videocassette came into possession of this plaintiff/appellant's federal protected through a "Theft" by an "Organized Crime Syndicate" in which they became members. 

        2. The alleged Producer "Sodenburg" in a premeditated scheme had been in possession of this plaintiff/appellants federal protected copyrights and knew at all times  that the copyrights were in fact "stolen".

Sodenburg and the defendants/respondents through a premeditated scheme unlawfully used this plaintiff/appellants federal protected copyrights that were "Stolen" and devised a criminal scheme with its members of the  "Organized Crime Syndicate" to pre-date a fraudulent 1991 MTP videocassette that was used as  title in an attempt of evading criminal liability, civil liability with the objective and intent of barring "discovery". Discovery in this case was the linchpin and crucial factor  that would have led to the prosecution, exposure and convictions of the members linked to the "Organized Crime Syndicate". 

   3. The defendants/respondents - NBC Universal Inc. et al, knew at all times that they were in possession of this plaintiff/appellant's federal protected copyrights and have taken an active role and steps in participating in this criminal scheme of this "Organized Crime Syndicate"  by preparing documents needed to validate the 1991 MTP videocassette.

        4.These defendants/respondents had perpetrated numerous felonies and frauds in attempting to subterfuge the crimes they have flagrantly committed, believing  at all times that discovery in this case would be barred.

         5. Dr. Rico Semonini an  employee at NBC Universal came into possession of this plaintiff/appellant's federal protected copyrights through "thefts" without the consent or permission  of this plaintiff/appellant.  A  physical theft occurring at Dr. Rico Semonini's house  on August 21st, 1998 a police report concerning this theft was filed in Los Angeles.
Police Report No. 980626165.

        6. NBC Universal Inc.  et al., the defendants/respondents were all in possession of this plaintiff/appellant's federal protected copyrights  through a "theft" without consent or permission of this plaintiff/appellant.

             7. John Hamburg the alleged writer of both Meet the Parents and Meet the Fockers is a "fraud" along with the other writers that were in possession of this plaintiff/appellant's stolen federal copyrights.  These writers  had claimed authorship of this plaintiff/appellant's federal protective copyrights that were "stolen" and unlawfully used  without express permission or consent. 

John Hamburg is linked and connected to the "Organized Crime Syndicate" as is Dr. Americo Semonini, Steven Sodenburg and other members of the defendants/respondents in this case they are all linked to the "theft".      

            8. These defendants/respondents had known at all times that this plaintiff/appellant's copyrights were "stolen" and through a premeditated scheme they devised an unconscionable plan to evade prosecution through  numerous crimes, felonies, frauds that led to the  tampering of federal evidence, perjuring affidavits, planting and back dating an alleged  pre-existed videocassette copyright.

A legal maneuver that was "outrageous" and needed in a blatant attempt to block discovery in the court. 

                9. The complaint  was formulated by this plaintiff/appellant  with the assistance of attorneys from the "same office" that with intent and premeditation have unethically sabotaged parts of the complaint due to there involvement to the "theft" and "Organized Crime Syndicate".  The judge in his decision relied on portions of the complaint by these same attorneys, connected  to the theft ring that had an interest in the outcome of the case.

10. The defendants/respondents in the summary judgment motion, did not oppose any opposition or affidavits  concerning the "Theft of the Stolen Copyrights" relating to the transportation of stolen federal  goods interstate and international, fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, and did not oppose the  police report in essence the defendants/respondents did not  "answer or oppose"  anything concerning the "theft" of this plaintiff/appellants federal protected copyrights. 

11. The 79 page comparison sheet formulated "after" the complaint clearly demonstrated and proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all of the characters, scenes and settings were stolen  by defendants/respondents and used unlawfully clearly demonstrating and proving that the defendants/respondents were in fact guilty of the theft and "Verbatim Copying and Plagiarism". These facts are indisputable. 

12. Discovery in this case was a "crucial factor" in exposing the "Organized Crime Syndicate" and its members, that have been protected by political connections, frauds, perjured affidavits, tampered federal evidence,  and corruption in our court system.

 
These copyrights were "stolen" through intervals of time -  January, 1997 , April 15th, 1998 and August 21st, 1998