Chivalry Film Productions®

Meet the Parents, Meet the Fockers, Wedding Crashers and other movies in the industry are a product of "Stolen Federal Copyright Materials" originally created and owned by Joseph Ardito and stolen by the defendants/respondents "Organized Crime Syndicate" in a premeditated scheme of depriving this plaintiff/appellant of his federal protected copyrights.

The Judges in these cases barred "discovery" even though the predated 1991 Meet the Parents videocassette was a "fraud", used as a title and nothing more.  This 1991 MTP was planted by employees at the Library of Congress to wit: Tracie Coleman and Richard D. Sharp whom have both with premeditation and intent perjured affidavits  and tampered with federal evidence in an attempt of trying to validate a pre-existing 1991 MTP videocassette that was a blatant fraud  that  had been planted.  These same employees were held responsible and liable for the copying of all the evidence in these cases.  This plaintiff appellant had over "35 pages" of federal protected copyrighted pages missing from one copyright and a number of pages missing from other copyrights. 

All of the crimes, perjured affidavits, tampered federal evidence and attorneys linked to the theft ring who knew at all times that "criminal copyright infringement" could be proved beyond any reasonable doubt, so in essence they sabotaged the complaint with the intent of trying to have the cases dismissed due to their own criminal involvement.  The judge based his manipulated and distorted decisions  by protecting these defendants/respondents by desperately  seeking "similar" characters, "similar" scenes and "similar" settings in  bits and pieces in a desperate attempt to formulate a bias  and senseless decision.  However, these  decisions were in fact corrupted for the following reasons to wit:  The characters, scenes and settings were in fact all similar! The sabotaging  of the complaint  by attorneys from this plaintiff/petitioner's same law office who in fact knew the characters, scenes and settings were in fact "similar"  that  is why they intentionally sabotaged the complaint. These attorneys knew at all times that copyright infringement could be proven beyond any reasonable doubt !  These same attorneys were in fact involved in the "theft" and are directly linked to the "theft ring" and "Organized Crime Syndicate".  

The judge in these cases relied on  bits and pieces of the "SAME" characters, "SAME" scenes and "SAME" settings that were in fact "SIMILAR" stating that the defendants could decontruct the similarities, however, whatever characters, scenes or settings that the judge  stated could be "decontructed" could "easily" be "recontructed" by this plaintiff/petitioner by taking these "SAME" characters, scenes and settings in "full"!  This actually proved "Verbatim Copying" and "Plagiarism" beyond any reasonable doubt in essence considering all the circumstances involving the theft criminal copyright infringement!  

The judges in these cases barred discovery even though a "79 page comparison sheet" formulated by this plaintiff/petitioner proved beyond any reasonable doubt that all of the characters, scenes and settings were unlawfully extracted from this plaintiff/petitioner's copyrights  and in fact "stolen" and unlawfully used in these movies.

The facts in these cases will always "remain the same"  and never change because these facts are Indisputable!     

 The judges in these cases relied on crimes, frauds, political connections and corruption in these cases and any judge in any other case  referring or relating to these decisions as legally binding  ..Chivalry Film Productions, et al v. NBC Universal Inc, et al., 05-cv-5627 as a legal ruling will never change the fact that these decisions were in fact corrupted and manifested by crimes, frauds, felonies, political connections and corruption in our court system creating a total miscarriage of justice. These unlawful decisions through public exposure will eventually be reversed! 

Any judge using these cases in an attempt of validating this decision  or any other decision  relating to these cases continues to create an  "Abomination Of  The Law". 
 
The alleged 1991 Meet the Parents predated videocassette copyright is a "fraud" and "not credible" used as a title and nothing more!  It had been tampered and planted by the theft ring and was part of a premeditated scheme unlawfully used by the defendants attorneys with the intent of manipulating and distorting  the decisions in these cases.  
                       
                              The Facts
                 "Organized Crime Syndicate"  

       1. Gregg Glienna and Mary Ruth Clarke the alleged owners of the 1991 MTP Videocassette came into possession of this plaintiff/appellant's federal protected through a "Theft". 

        2. The alleged Producer "Sodenburg" is linked to the 1991 Meet the Parents videocassette.  The defendants/respondents through a premeditated scheme had been in possession of this plaintiff/appellants federal protected copyrights and knew at all times  that the copyrights were in fact "stolen".

Sodenburg and the defendants/respondents had through a premeditated scheme unlawfully used this plaintiff/appellants federal protected copyrights that were "Stolen" and devised a criminal scheme with its members of the  "Organized Crime Syndicate" to pre-date a fraudulent 1991 MTP videocassette that was used as  title and nothing more, in a blatant  attempt of evading criminal liability, civil liability with the objective and intent of barring "discovery".

Discovery in this case was the linchpin and crucial factor  that would have led to the prosecution, exposure and convictions of the members linked to the "Organized Crime Syndicate". 

   3. The defendants/respondents - NBC Universal Inc. et al, knew at all times that they were in possession of this plaintiff/petitioner's federal protected copyrights and have taken an active role and steps in participating in this criminal  scheme of this "Organized Crime Syndicate"  by preparing and  producing fraudulent documents that were needed and offered into evidence in an attempt to  validate the "fraudulent" 1991 MTP videocassette.

        4. These defendants/respondents had perpetrated numerous felonies and frauds in attempting to subterfuge the crimes they have intentionally committed, believing  at all times that the judges would bar "discovery" a crucial factor in the case that would expose all involved in this criminal enterprise.

         5. Dr. Rico Semonini an  employee at NBC Universal and an employee at the same law firm as plaintiff/petitioner came into possession of this plaintiff/appellant's federal protected copyrights through an interval of "thefts" without  the consent or permission  of this plaintiff/petitioner.  A  physical theft occurring at Dr. Rico Semonini's house  on August 21st, 1998 was reported to the L.A.P.D.in Los Angeles.
Police Report No. 980626165.

        6. NBC Universal Inc.  et al., the defendants/respondents were all in possession of this plaintiff/petitioner's federal protected copyrights  through  "thefts" without consent or permission.

             7. John Hamburg the alleged writer of both Meet the Parents and Meet the Fockers attended undergrad with attorneys from this plaintiff/petitioner's same office. John Hamburg is a writer "fraud" along with the other writer frauds claiming authorship by copyright thefts!  

These defendants/respondents and their writers  are copyrights "THIEVES and "FRAUDS"  that claimed authorship of federal protective copyrights that were "stolen" and unlawfully used  without express permission or consent of this plaintiff/petitioner. 

John Hamburg is linked and connected to the "Organized Crime Syndicate" as is Dr. Americo Semonini, Steven Sodenburg and other members of the defendants/respondents in these cases they are all linked to the theft and " Organized Crime Syndicate".     

            8. These defendants/respondents had known at all times that this plaintiff/petitioner's copyrights were "stolen" and through a premeditated scheme devised, in an unconscionable plan and manner to evade criminal and civil prosecution by perpetrating numerous crimes, felonies, frauds that led to the  tampering of federal evidence, perjuring affidavits, attorneys involved in the theft actually help formulate the complaint with the intent of sabotage due to their own criminal involvement concerning the thefts, the planting and back dating of the alleged  1991 MTP fraud a pre-existed videocassette copyright. This was used as a title and nothing more!

These legal maneuvers were premeditated and intentionally devised in a blatant attempt to block "discovery" in the court, that would expose the political connections and the corrupted officials in our government that are destroying a fair and impartial justice system. 

                9. The complaint  was formulated by this plaintiff/appellant  with the assistance of attorneys from the "same law office" that with intent and premeditation have unethically sabotaged parts of the complaint due to there involvement in the "theft" and ties to the  "Organized Crime Syndicate".  

The judges in his decisions relied on bits and pieces of the complaint that these same attorneys sabotaged with the intent of manipulating and distorting the decisions. These attorneys are tied and connected  to the Organized Crime Syndicate and were involved in the intervals of thefts of this plaintiff/appellants federal protected copyrights that were stolen.

10. The defendants/respondents in the summary judgment motion, did not oppose any opposition or affidavits  concerning the "Theft of the Stolen Copyrights" relating to the transportation of stolen federal  goods interstate and international, fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, and did not oppose the  police report in essence the defendants/respondents did not  "answer or oppose"  anything concerning the "theft" of this plaintiff/appellants federal protected copyrights. 

11. The 79 page comparison sheet formulated "after" the complaint clearly demonstrated and proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all of the characters, scenes and settings were stolen  by defendants/respondents and used unlawfully clearly demonstrating and proving that the defendants/respondents were in fact guilty of the theft, "Verbatim Copying and Plagiarism". These facts are indisputable. 

12. Discovery in this case was a "crucial factor" in exposing the "Organized Crime Syndicate" and its members, that have been protected by political connections, frauds, perjured affidavits, tampered federal evidence,  and corruption in our court system.

 
These copyrights were "stolen" through intervals of time -  January, 1997 , April 15th, 1998 and August 21st, 1998