Chivalry Film Productions®

Meet the Parents, Meet the Fockers, Wedding Crashers and other movies in the industry are derived from "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Tenant" and/or "The Dysfunctionals" originally created and owned by Joseph Ardito 5 (Five) federal copyrights in total including compilations and revisions amounting to  over 2,500 pages of script "stolen" by the defendants/respondents and unlawfully used in the above movies.

In the decision of Chivalry Film Productions, et al v. NBC Universal Inc., et al. The judge leaves out the fact that complaint paragraph 1941- After viewing Meet the Parents and Meet the Fockers it was quite clear and evident to this plaintiff, that these screenplays were in fact a blatant copyright infringement of Plaintiffs "stolen" federal copyrighted works. 

The judge's decision in summary judgment relied on bits and pieces the original complaint that was formulated by attorneys  at the same office that were involved in the theft and linked to the Organized Crime Syndicate.  This same law firm is linked and connected to the defendants/respondents in these cases.  These defendants/respondents have unethically engaged in a continuous course of criminal conduct with the intent of sabotaging this plaintiff/appellants cases. 

These attorneys are also affiliated with defendants/respondents their writers  John Hamburg the "Fraud"  and other writers allegedly involved in this copyright theft involving Meet the Parents , Meet the Fockers, Wedding Crashers and other movies in the industry that have unlawfully used this plaintiff/appellants 5 federal protected copyrights.

These defendants/respondents are NBC, Twentieth Century Fox, Dreamworks, and other defendants. These multi billion dollar conglomerates that have political connections in the courts and through these connections are destroying the fundamentals of a "fair and impartial system of justice" all due to corruption and greed.  

Any blogs against this plaintiff/appellant by anyone affiliated with defendants/respondents  "Organized Crime Syndicate" should be taken with a "grain of salt".

The premeditated scheme would have been exposed through  "Discovery" however, discovery a "crucial factor" in the case was barred by the court, even though  a 79 page comparison sheet that proved beyond any reasonable doubt that all of the characters, scenes and settings were a product of this plaintiff/appellants federal protected copyrights that were "stolen" by the defednants/respondents.

The defendants /respondents were in possession of this plaintiff/appellants federal protected copyrights through a theft and knowingly used these stolen federal copyrights unlawfully. The defendants/respondents are guilty of "Verbatim Copying" "Plagiarism" and have perpetrated and violated  numerous laws by committing acts of perjury, tampering with federal  evidence, fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, transportation of stolen federal goods interstate and international and a number of other felonies. 
 
The "Horror Screenplay" referred to in the court decision is the "Planted, altered and tampered" "1991 Meet the Parents videocassette" allegedly found at the Library of Congress in a black box with "no labels".  This "planted, altered, tampered federal evidence" was a fraud and part of a premeditated scheme trumped up and introduced by members of defendants/respondents Organized Crime Syndicateand that has infiltrated the Library of Congress as it was validated by two "perjured affidavits" employees linked and connected to the "Organized Crime Syndicate" that are actually employed at the "Library of Congress" to wit: Tracie Coleman and Richard D. Sharp who both along with Steven Sodenberg, Gregg Glienna and Mary Ruth Clarke introduced this "Fraud" as a pre-dated videocassette copyright. This "Fraud" concerning the planted, altered, tampered federal evidence of the "1991 MTP videocassette" by Gregg Glienna and Mary Ruth Clarke was used by the defendants/respondents "attorneys" in a pre-meditated scheme to bar "Discovery" in the case, this way the defendants/respondents "Organize Crime Syndicate" would evade exposure and prosecution. This 1991 Meet the Parents videocassette is a  "Fraud"  serving no purpose with the exception of a  "title" used by the defendants/respondents.

All of the characters, scenes and settings used in "Meet the Parents", Meet the Fockers were created by this plaintiff/appellant. All of the individuals involved in this premeditated scheme including and not limited to the defendants/respondents  are linked and have worked in concert to unlawfully deprive this plaintiff/appellant of his federal protected copyrights entitled "The Tenant"  and/or "The Dysfunctionals". 

The alleged "1991 Meet the Parents videocassette" was found at the Library of Congress in a black box and is not credible because it had been planted, altered and tampered.  The alleged authors Gregg Glienna and Mary Ruth Clarke are linked and connected to the "Theft Ring" and were at all times during the theft in  "possession" of this plaintiff/appellants "federal protected copyrights" entitled "The Tenant" and/or "The Dysfunctionals" along with Steven Sodenberg a producer affiliated with NBC Universal and the rest of the defendants/respondents in this case. Whom were all in possession of this plaintiff/appellant's stolen "Federal Protected Copyrights".

John Hamburg the  alleged screenwriter of both Meet the Parents and Meet the Fockers is linked to the "Organized Crime Syndicate" and was in possession of this plaintiff/appellant's stolen "Federal Protected Copyrights" at all times. John Hamburg is a fraud taken credit along with other writers that have unlawfully stole and  used this  plaintiff/appellant's "stolen" "Federal Protected Copyrights" through a "THEFT" and premeditated scheme that had been carried out in an unconscionable manner by the defendants/respondents with the sole intent of depriving this plaintiff/appellant of his "Federal Protected Copyrights" entitled "The Tenant" and/or "The Dysfunctionals". 

The alleged "1991 Meet the Parents" videocassette by Gregg Glienna and Mary Ruth Clarke is the "Horror movie" mentioned in Find law by Nathan. In a nutshell this 1991 MTP videocassette was narrated by a gas station attendant "everyone in the family is killed" including the dog.  This federal evidence had been introduced by two perjured affidavits by Tracie Coleman and Richard D. Sharp both employed at the "Library of Congress" these employees are also connected to the "Organized Crime Syndicate" this evidence was planted and is not credibility. These same employees were entrusted with the copies of all the evidence in this case in where over 30 pages of this plaintiff/appellants novel/screenplay had been missing.  
  
Important: It should be noted that the 1991 MTP videocassette the horror movie was "not written" by the plaintiff/appellant Joseph Ardito but was used as a title and "nothing more" to conceal and subterfuge the "theft" of this plaintiff/appellant's federal protected copyrights entitled "The Tenant" and/or "The Dysfunctionals" that was unlawfully used in the making of  defendants/respondents projects entitled "Meet the Parents", Meet the Fockers", "Wedding  Crashers" and other movies in the industry.


The revisions and manipulations that this plaintiff/appellant complains about in his complaint are authors who have  stolen this plaintiff/appellant's federal protected copyrights and have claimed authorship. These defendants/respondents have used this plaintiff/appellant's federal protected copyrights and unlawfully copyrighted the "same" under a different "title" at the Library of Congress through the "Organized Crime Syndicate" and its members that are planted and employed at the Library of Congress to carry out the unlawful stealing of copyrights.  

All of the characters, scenes and settings from the defendants/respondents copyrights entitled "Meet the Parents", "Meet the Fockers", "Wedding Crashers" and other movies in the industry were stolen by the defendants/respondents and are products of this plaintiff/appellant's "five" federal protected copyrights.

The original creation of characters, scenes and settings were originally created and copyrighted  by Joseph Ardito entitled "The Tenant and/or "The Dysfunctionals" a total of "5" federal protected copyrights amounting to over 2,500 pages of  script including and not  limited to compilations  and revisions. These "stolen" federal protected copyrights were used as  a "blueprint" in the making of numerous projects in the industry.

Let the "PUBLIC" judge in "FAIRNESS". 

The judge in his decision takes similar characters, scenes and settings in bits in trying to prove dissimilarities however taking these same characters, scenes and settings in "full" proves beyond any reasonable doubt that defendants/respondents were in possession and had stolen this plaintiff/appellant's federal protected copyrights and are guilty of "Verbatim Copying and Plagiarism.  

The defendants/respondents attorneys used similar characters, scenes and settings in trying to prove dissimilarities  that actually help prove criminal copyright infringement.  However, through political connections, frauds, crimes and corruption, the decision in this case not only violates the laws of the United States but other countries signatories of the "Berne Convention". A treaty designed to protect copyrights in other countries.

This plaintiff/appellant's 5 copyrights are entitled "The Tenant" and/or The Dysfunctionals" a comical satire ridiculing dysfunctional families. See the following:   Characters, Scenes and Settings:

Characters and Scenes in "The Tenant" and/or "The Dysfunctionals" : Father Character - No one is good enough for  his daughter a cynical and apprehensive attitude,  Mother Character easy going, Daughter Character, Son-in-law - screw up, CIA Character - cynical and apprehensive, Watching You Scenes, lie detector test, investigative scenes, talking Asian Dialect, rules and regulations of the house, claimed to have  been in the Oval Office knowing President Clinton, Colin Powell the General, covert secret operative etc., truth serum, show of authority,  Nurse Character - gay ridicule, football game, going both ways,   Attorney Character - issues, karate scenes, Psychiatrist Character -Sex Therapist getting to the foundation  of the problem,  rational vs.. dysfunctional method in bringing up children, all he needed was a huge as a child, Senior Citizens, Family Members - lecherous, lascivious, Doctors, Judge- connection in the court, Police, Bureau of Child Welfare, Court Officer, ASPCA Animal Shelter dog, flight attendants, Cops, Doctors, etc., etc. 

Scenes in "The Tenant and/or The Dysfunctionals" : I'm Watching You Scenes !!! Peeking through the window as the character pulls up into the driveway of the house, what kind of car do you drive? "circle of trust", Claiming to have  taken a shower but the hair is noticeably dry, Lie Detector Test scene, Cheap bottle of Champagne, Hidden surveillance camera scene, refers to individuals as fucker, investigative scene in where the individual feels traumatize after the ordeal of the lie detector test, skimpy bathing suit scene, intimidation scene you are going downtown, talking Asian dialect scenes, eavesdropping on the phone scenes, climbing  up on a rooftop, karate scenes, frayed wire scenes, rules and regulation of the house scenes, jimmying the locks scene, going through the drawers, truth serum scene in where true feelings emerge, liar, Woman sustains injury to her nose in a volleyball game, Michael Angelo of Carpentry ordering wood from a different country, stun gun scene talking about voltage as it is administered, passing out drunk scene, lazar/ tranquilizer gun scene, hospital scene in where a woman is giving birth and the husband and wife are skeptical about the qualifications of the hospital staff however the delivery goes well, jack-knifing in front of a no parking zone, race home in where the vehicles pull up making eye contact "exactly 3 times", shredded clothes scene, being carried off by police by arms and legs, interrogation scene, wake up to find a drawing meaning that someone had been in his bedroom, airport alone scene, engagement ring scene, judge connection scene, court pen scene, Minister - Monk who studied theology abroad, and many more scenes, etc., etc. 


The Characters, Scenes and Settings from this plaintiff/appellant's copyrights entitled "The Tenant" and/or The Dysfunctionals" clearly prove and demonstrate beyond any reasonable doubt that  "VERBATIM COPYING" and "Plagiarism" in essence "CRIMINAL COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT" had occurred.

"NONE" OF THE ABOVE CHARACTERS, SCENES OR SETTINGS ARE USED IN THE ALLEGED FRAUD! The  tampered "1991  MEET THE PARENTS VIDEOCASSETTE" THAT WAS USED AS A "TITLE" and nothing more. This planted tampered videocassette was unlawfully used, in an attempt to conceal and subterfuge the "theft" of this plaintiff/appellant's stolen "Federal Protected Copyrights" that were unlawfully used  by the defendants/respondents "Organized Crime Syndicate" in the making of "Meet the Parents", "Meet the Fockers", Wedding Crashers and other movies in the industry that have used this plaintiff/appellant's copyrights that were stolen. 

The defendants/respondents devised a premeditated scheme in the unlawful use of this  plaintiff/appellant's federal protected copyrights, unlawfully using characters, scenes and settings in the unlawful making of Meet the Parents 2000, Meet the Fockers 2004, Wedding Crashers and other movies in industry.  

The ingenuity of this premeditated scheme falls short of reality when the defendants/respondents actually split the same characters, settings and scenes into sequels and other movies in an attempt to conceal and subterfuge the theft and the defendants/respondents actually use similar scenes in trying to prove dissimilarities.  All of this is "Indisputable" and evidenced in the federal court proceedings, clearing demonstrating and proving that the defendants/respondents are guilty of criminal copyright infringement: "Verbatim Copying" and "Plagiarism". The new case in Chivalry Film Productions,et al., v. Universal Pictures Inc, et al., clearly proves a predicate act for a Civil and Criminal RICO. 

THE WRITERS IN THESE MOVIES ARE "FRAUDS" AND THIS I STATE "UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY"  TO THE PUBLIC AND COURT. 

NBC and TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX ARE DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS IN THIS CASE ALONG WITH OTHER STUDIO COMPANIES.  See "litigation"  to the left of this screen - Open it and scroll down  to the bottom and see the caption of the "complaint".

THESE COMPANIES HAVE MADE "BILLIONS OF DOLLARS" BY STEALING AND UNLAWFULLY USING  THIS PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT'S "FEDERAL PROTECTED COPYRIGHTS". THEY HAVE A MORALE OBLIGATION TO SET  THE RECORD STRAIGHT. HOWEVER, THEY RELY ON POLITICAL CONNECTIONS, FRAUD, CRIMES AND CORRUPTION IN  A SYSTEM  OF DECADENCE AND MORALE TURPITUDE BECAUSE THEY ARE ILL WILLED AND  UNCONSCIONABLE. THE DEFENDANTS/REPSONDENTS OWN THE MEDIA AND BELIEVE THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW CLEARLY MAKING THEM IMMUNE FROM ANY PROSECUTION.  All  DUE TO POLITICAL CONNECTIONS, CRIMES, FRAUDS AND CORRUPTION IN OUR COURT SYSTEM  THAT IS RIDICULING AND DESTROYING A FAIR SYSTEM OF JUSTICE IN OUR COUNTRY AND OTHER COUNTRIES LEGAL SYSTEM.  

THESE DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS ARE NO  DIFFERENT THEN "BERNIE MADOFF" THE CON MAN  WHO HAD STOLEN BILLIONS IN PEOPLES' LIFE SAVINGS HOWEVER, BERNIE MADOFF DIDN'T HAVE THE CONNECTIONS IN THE COURT OR MEDIA.
 
The defendants/respondents have stolen my life's works  that amount to over billions of dollars in damages but the difference between Bernie Madoff and the defendants/respondents is that they are protected by political connections and corruption in the system because they are the Media. The defendants/respondents even had the "Gall" to actually copyright this plaintiff/appellant's "Federal Copyrights" that defendants/respondents that were "Stolen" so they would be protected.

This is not only absurd but outrageous. These copyrights rightfully and legally belong to this plaintiff/appellant Joseph Ardito. 

THESE SCOUNDRELS  WILL NOT BE PROSECUTED BECAUSE THEY ARE AN  "ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE" WITH TIES TO  THE STUDIOS, THE UNITED STATES LIBRARY OF CONGRESS AND  HAVE THE KIND OF POLITICAL CONNECTIONS  AND CORRUPTION IN THE COURT SYSTEM THAT IS  DESTROYING OUR "FAIR SYSTEM OF JUSTICE" IN THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER COUNTRIES SIGNATORIES TO THE BERNE CONVENTION. 

"PLEASE !! TELL FRIENDS, FAMILY MEMBERS AND CO-WORKERS  ABOUT THIS CASE". 
SPREAD THE NEWS ABOUT THIS CASE - TO STOP  THIS  "ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE" THAT IS ONLY PREVAILING  THROUGH POLITICAL CONNECTIONS, CRIMES. FRAUDS AND  CORRUPTION IN OUR LEGAL SYSTEM!!

   



The sequel to this plaintiff/appellant's federal protected copyright entitled "The Tenant" and/or "The Dysfunctionals"    is that The Tenant goes off to "Meet another dysfunctional family" "squarely" fitting into "Meet the Fockers 2004  " with all characters, scenes and settings.

The sequel to the "Fraud" alleged "1991 Meet the Parents videocassette" - the "Altered, tampered federal evidence" - A father taking his children to the circus where everyone would be massacred this is your "horror movie" video cassette  by Gregg Glienna and Mary Ruth Clarke. 

The judge barred "discovery" in this case meaning "no depositions" "no interrogatories" "no pleadings" and the summary judgment motion by the defendants/respondents was procured by connivance and fraud - formulated by "Tampered Federal Evidence" and substantiated by "Two Perjured Affidavits".
 

THIS ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE THAT IS PROTECTED BY "POLITICAL CONNECTIONS AND CORRUPTION" HAS TO BE PROSECUTED IN  THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

ANY GRAMMAR SCHOOL STUDENT  OR ANYONE WHO CAN READ WOULD KNOW THAT "VERBATIM COPYING" AND "PLAGIARISM" IN ESSENCE "CRIMINAL COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT HAS OCCURRED BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. 

PLEASE HELP BY TELLING FRIENDS, CO-WORKERS AND FAMILY MEMBERS ABOUT THIS CASE !!!!   SPREAD THE WORD AND STOP THIS "ORGANIZED CRIME SYNDICATE" THE POLITICAL CONNECTIONS AND CORRUPTION IN OUR COURT SYSTEM. 

They are using the "Media"  to distort and manipulate the findings of this case.  This case needs "Public Attention" "NBC" channel 4 and "Fox" channel 5  are some of the defendants in this action.  

Any blogs  by the defendants/respondents friends or attorneys should be taken with a grain of salt because the decisions of the court are biased and prejudicial and have been based on frauds, crimes, felonies and corruption.  The  manipulations and distortion of this case backed by  political connections, frauds, crimes and corruption is destroying a fair system of justice in our court system.