Chivalry Film Productions®

Stolen Hollywood Blockbusters - Meet the Parents, Meet the Fockers, Wedding Crashers and other movies in the industry that were "stolen" by an Organized Crime Syndicate.

 

The Chivalry News Corpora

Blog Opposition

Principals

Opposition to blogs

The Chivalry News Corp.

Litigation-blogs

Evidence

Access - police report

The alleged 1991 MTP

"The Fraud"

unbiased Journalist

Litigation

Contact

Chivalry Store


See: Litigation Blogs

This litigation blog has been created on a "good faith basis" under penalties of perjury, to oppose any and all decisions or blogs created by the defendants/respondents and the corrupted federal courts in an attempt by plaintiff/petitioner to expose the  blatant prejudices , lbiases and conflicts of interest that plague a fair system of justice in the Judicial Branch of Government Protecting NBC's organized Crime Syndicate !

The political connections and corruption in our court system , Library of Congress , U.S.Attorney Generals Office , F.B.I. & Los Angeles Police Department protecred the studio defendants/respondents' "Organized Crime Syndicate" because of their political links and billionaire status that makes the studio defendants/respondents untouchable and above the law as NBC et al., studio defendants evade criminal / civil liability because they politically control America! .
 

The defendants/respondents throughout this case have  brazenly ridiculed due process and our constitution by perpetrating and committing numerous crimes, frauds, perjuries throughout these federal court proceedings knowing that they would not be prosecuted in any form or manner. 

This premeditated scheme included political connections and corruption in the Library of Congress and the court system. 

These "political connections and corruption" plague our fair system of justice and promote lawlessness that creates the kind of  biases and prejudices that destroy not only a fair system of justice but our entire Judicial System. 


This plaintiff/petitioner was denied discovery even though a 79 page comparison sheet proved beyond any reasonable doubt that all of the characters, scenes and settings were extracted from this plaintiff/petitioner federal protected copyrights that were in fact "STOLEN" !

Discovery is a tool in the legal system that  helps seek the truth but without Discovery no depositions, no interrogatories or pleadings are allowed. 

In essence this billion dollar "Organized Crime Syndicate  is protected from exposure that includes civil and criminal prosecution by outrageous bias decisions that undermine our
entire legal system clearly violating due process and our constitution, a person's right to a
"Fair and Impartial Proceeding".

 

The defendants/respondents have intentionally tampered with federal evidence in this case by having employees to wit: Tracie Coleman and Richard D. Sharp employed at the "Library  of Congress's"  Copyright office whom have both intentionally perjured affidavits and tampered with federal evidence in these court proceedings. 

The pre-dated manufactured fraudulent "1991 MTP copyright" was used by Hollywood's Organized Crime Syndicate in the stolen federal copyright cases to evade any and all civil and criminal liabilities. 

 

Any blog or decision in relation to these cases against this plaintiff/petitioner should be taken with a "grain of salt" because the facts in these cases speak for themselves. 

This plaintiff/petitioner created a "79" page chart of "similarities" in Characters, Scenes and Settings that clearly demonstrate and prove  
"Verbatim Copying", " Plagiarism"
in essence considering the premeditated theft "Criminal Copyright Infringement"! 
These cases could be proven  beyond any reasonable doubt a burden of proof greater then a mere preponderance of evidence needed for copyright infringement. 

See: chivalryfilmproducions.com Characters, Scenes and Settings.  




Meet the Parents, Meet the Fockers, Wedding Crashers and other movies  in  the industry are derived from "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" owned and originally created by Joseph Ardito. 

The "Written Copyrights" owned and originally created by Joseph Ardito and filed at the
Library Of Congress are as follows:
May 15th, 1996 (TXu-74-462), December 24th, 1996 (TXu-775-750),
April 27th, 1998 (PAu-2-283-460), February 2nd, 1999 (PAu-2-380-629,
July 15th, 1999 (PAu-2-423-720).

Los Angeles Police Department Complaint filed on August 21st, 1998
Complaint No - 98062165 (Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials).

   This case has been to the
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.


The defendants in this case have made over $4,000,000,000.00 (Four Billion Dollars) from the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" that were originally created and owned by Joseph Ardito. The defendants in this case have  used the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" as a  blueprint in the  making of  "Meet the Parents", "Meet the Fockers", "Wedding Crashers" and other movies in the industry as the defendants-respondents try and pass these projects off as their own original creation. The writers and screenwriters are
"Frauds" that have unlawfully copied  and plagiarized from these "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Tenant" and/or "The Dysfunctionals" originally  created and owned by Joseph Ardito. 

"Public Awareness"
Discovery a constitutional right in litigation has been barred by the courts even though the defendants in this case have tampered with federal evidence concerning the alleged 1991 videocassette that has paved the way to Summary Judgment. However, the Overwhelming Characters, Scenes and Settings alone are enough to prove "Criminal Copyright Infringement" due to the unlawful copying and plagiarism by the alleged screenwriters and authors that are  "Frauds" who have unlawfully copied and  plagiarized from  "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Tenant" and/or "The Dysfunctionals" falsely claiming an original creation of "Meet the Parents", "Meet the Fockers", "Wedding Crashers" and other movies in the  industry that were unlawfully copied and plagiarized from  "Federal Protected Copyrighted Materials" that were stolen by the defendants-respondents from the
originally creator Joseph Ardito. 

 However, due to the amount of monetary damages in this case the political connections, corruption and "greed" have persuaded justice to turn a blind eye in this case. 

 
The defendants in this case have relied on Racketeering, Theft, Frauds, Plagiarism, Copying, Criminal Conduct, Discrimination, Tampering of Federal Evidence and corruption as defenses in this case.  The political connections and corruption have taken this country back 150 years in where discrimination knew no boundaries. 

The true perpetrators and discriminators of the industry will surface as  they  expose themselves in defending the "Organized Crime Syndicates' " involvement of the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" due to direct or indirect involvement relating to the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials."
     

         A tacit approval or the condoning of the defendants criminal conduct in this case will only undermine the public's perception of justice. The tampering of federal evidence in this case is a felony, the transportation of stolen federal goods interstate and international are felonies, wire fraud and mail fraud are felonies, etc., etc.  The defendants-respondents in this case have committed so many felonies that they are immune from federal prosecution in this case. 
 

The alleged distorted 1991 Meet the Parents videocassette found in a black box at the Library of Congress even planting this distorted videocassette  at the Library of  Congress serves "no purpose" in this case with the exception of trying  to deceptively mask, subterfuge and conceal the use of the overwhelming "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" that have been copied and plagiarized by the defendants-respondents in this case.

The perjured affidavits and testimonials given by employees, employed at the Library of Congress have with intent and premeditation falsified and altered evidence in this case concerning the alleged 1991 MTP distorted videocassette clearly demonstrating and concluding that this evidence is not credible because of voice over, alterations  and distortions. The defendants-respondents have deceptively acted with intent and premeditation even throughout the "court proceedings" with respect to this evidence that had been used in barring discovery in a blatant attempt to mask, subterfuge and conceal unlawful use of  the "Federal Protected Copyrighted Materials" originally created by Joseph Ardito that have been stolen by the defendants-respondents and unlawfully copied and plagiarized.
However, the defendants-respondents' 
"Organized Crime Syndicate"
believe  they are above the law because they are protected by 
political connections, crimes, frauds and corruption a total  manipulation and  distortion of the law and our Judicial Branch  of  Government.
 

The Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials


My copyrights that were "stolen" by the defendants/respondents were not only "similar" through a 79 page comparison sheet that incorporates all of the stolen characters, stolen scenes and stolen settings in essence a product of
"Verbatim Copying and Plagiarism"!

This could be proven "beyond any reasonable doublt" at  a trial before a "Public Forum" through the "MEDIA"  so the defendants/respondents
"will not be able" 
 to rely on the Corrupt political connections and corruptioin that is destroying our fair system of justice.


The Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials entitled, "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" were used in the making of defendants' projects entitled, "Meet the Parents 2000" and "Meet the Fockers 2004."

"The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" is NOT a Horror Movie. It is a multi-faceted comical satire ridiculing dysfunctional families; house scenes that take place between a landlord and a tenant any reference to a Horror Movie is inaccurate and absurd.

Plaintiffs' Characters and Scenes from "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" that are similar to "Meet the Parents 2000" Characters and Scenes.
 

Characters and Scenes extracted from the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" owned and originally created by Joseph Ardito and unlawfully used by the defendants in the making of "Meet the Parents" 2000 consist of the following:

Characters:

CIA Agent Character, Nurse Character, Michael Angelo of Carpentry Character, Mother Character, Father Character, Pam Character, Brother-in-Law Character, The Animal Shelter Agent, Concerned Neighbor etc.,etc.

Scenes:

Jo Jo practicing in the mirror (stuttering) - Pam wi wi will you go out with me, High School Scene similar to Focker practicing "Pam  will you marry me.  Meeting the landlord similar Meeting  the Parents.   The landlord (cynical and apprehensively) is peeking through the blind as the tenant pulls into the drive way scene similar to Jack Brynes (cynical and apprehensively) is peeking through the window as Focker pulls into the driveway scene.  Landlord what kind  of car do you drive standard or automatic? similar to Jack Brynes what kind of car or did you pick the color scene. The landlord claims he was in the shower however his hair was dry scene similar to Gregg claiming that he was in the shower and his hair was dry scene. Landlord's rules and regulations of the house it my way or the shelter similar to Jack Brynes rules and regulations of the house it's  my way or the highway.  Landlord ridicules the tenant on his driving skills scene similar to Gregg being ridiculed on his driving skills.  Tenant  undergoes a Lie Detector Test similar to Gregg undergoing a lie detector test,  Tenant is traumatized by the lie detector test similar to Gregg being traumatized by the lie detector test,  Infrared Hidden Surveillance Camera similar to Jack Brynes hidden Surveillance Camera, Landlord I'm watching You Scenes similar to Jack Brynes I'm watching you scenes. Landlord stalking scenes similar to Jack Brynes stalking scenes. Allegiance the dysfunctionals had toward one another scene similar to Jack Brynes "Circle of Trust" scenes.  The viewing the content of the video tape from the hidden infrared Surveillance Camera that concludes that the landlord was guilty by the recorded evidence similar to Jack Brynes viewing the video recorded evidence proving  that Gregg was guilty by the recorded evidence. Volleyball Game Scene - in where a woman breaks her nose similar to Volleyball game scene in where Pam's sister sustains injury.  Skimpy Bathing Suit Scene similar to Gregg's skimpy bathing  suit scene, Gay ridicule scenes similar to Gay Ridicule scenes, Full luggage bag scene similar to full luggage bag scene, Jimmying open scene the door scenes similar to Jack Brynes jimmying open the bag scene, Ransacking the drawers scene similar to Pam's brother claiming that Gregg was going through his drawers, Content of lost luggage scene as sex paraphernalia Scene (pornographic). Flicking the badge Scene CIA character similar to Jack Brynes flicking the badge scene CIA,  Race home scene as to where the cars pull up parallel exactly (3) times making eye contact similar to Jack Brynes racing Focker in where the car pulls  up exactly 3 times parallel making eye contact, Eavesdropping scenes on the phone similar to Gregg eavesdropping  scenes on the phone, Asian dialect scene similar to Jack Brynes Asian dialect scene, Southern dialect scene similar Jack Brynes telling travel agent to use  a southern dialect scene, Landlord dresses up in a Nurses uniform scene for a nurse character similar Gregg Focker playing a male nurse and being ridiculed scene, Cheap bottle of champagne scene similar to Gregg  purchasing  a cheap bottle of champagne scene.  The call from the concerned neighbor scene about his neighbors dog similar to Jack Brynes receiving a phone message from a concerned neighbor about his cat. The ASPCA scene similar to animal shelter scene, The house looked like a hurricane disaster scene in where the clothes were actually shredded in a bizarre manner and the dog is found in the closet scene similar Jack Brynes returning home from  the restaurant entering his house as if  a hurricane hit it with the shredded clothes everywhere.   The Michael Angelo of carpentry scene including the cabinets (wood) from Vienna scene similar to Pam's ex-boyfriend whose hobby is carpentry ordering wood from Bolivia,  The eviction scene of the tenant takes place after finding the shredded clothes similar to Gregg's eviction from the premises following  the shredded clothes scene.  The Airport Scene which leads to arrest similar to Gregg's airport scene which  also leads to his arrest.  The tenant's interrogation scene takes place while he is restrained and handcuffed in a chair similar to Gregg's interrogation scene while  he is restrained and handcuffed  to a chair scene. The Arrest Scene - in where the alleged perpetrator was carried off by police by restraining both his arms and legs, while acting and moving like a raving lunatic scene similar to Gregg being carried off the plane by police by restraining his arms and legs, while acting like a raving lunatic. Landlord always time conscience thinking he's going to be late (tardy phobia) similar Jack Brynes always time conscience thinking he's going  to  be late (tardy phobia).  Father's bestiality joke similar to Jack Brynes bestiality joke scene. Father in relation to son-in-law this guy has been giving us problems since he came into the house scene similar Jack Brynes saying this guy has been giving us problems since he came into the house scene. The engagement ring at the airport similar to Focker looking  at the engagement ring scene at the airport.  The jack knifing of the car in front of a no parking zone scene similar to Jack Brynes jack knifing in front of a no parking zone scene. Driving erratically scene similar to Jack  Brynes and Focker driving  erratically scenes, Lying Scenes similar to Fockers lying scenes. Climbing up on the  roof scene in where a neighbor is being pursued  and vanishes in thin air like a cat  similar to Gregg climbing out onto the roof pursuing Jinx who vanishes into thin air and is a cat scene, The frayed wire and spark scene similar to the frayed  wired  and spark scene, The karate scenes are similar to Gregg's karate scenes and many more scenes.  

                  None of the above scenes are incorporated in  defendants distorted backdated 1991 Meet the Parents video-cassette version with "no written copyright" that without a doubt has to  be "FORENSICALLY EVALUATED". 


The Characters and Scenes extracted from the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" originally created and owned by Joseph Ardito that were unlawfully used in the making of the  defendants' project entitled "Meet the Fockers" 2004 consist of the following:

Characters:

The CIA Character, Attorney Character, The Psychiatrist Character, The Police Character, The Theologian/Minister Character/Carpenter Character, Senior Citizen Characters, Hospital Staff Characters, The In-Law Characters, The Relative Characters, The Bureau of Child Welfare Agent, The Court Officer Character, The Dog Character, The Judge Character.


Scenes:

A baby being born scene at the hospital - The parents feel apprehensive about the doctors medical qualification due to his mal practice, however, the delivery goes well scene similar Gregg delivering a baby at the hospital lacking  the medical qualifications  as  a doctor as  the parents feel apprehensive, however the delivery goes well scene.  Captain/Skipper scene in charge similar to Jack  Brynes  Captain/ Skipper scene in  charge, The karate scene similar to the karate scene, The renovation scene of the bathroom at the landlords house similar to the renovation scene of the bathroom at the Focker house, The Dysfunctional v. Rational Method Scene in bringing up children scene similar to the Ferber v. Focker method  in bringing up children scene.  Landlord Lazar - Stun gun Scene talking about voltage while administering to the tenant similar to Lazer stun gun scene talking about voltage while administering  to Focker, The police chase for speeding scene (stay in car) runs up to police similar to the police chasing the Fockers for speeding (stay in car) runs up to the police, The Exhibitionist (screaming in ecstasy) scene similar to the Focker exhibition  of  sex screaming in ecstasy while the Brynes are privy,  Time conscience scene similar to Jack Brynes  time conscience scene, The Theologian/Monk Scene similar to Pam's  ex-boyfriend Rabbi/Minister scene, Sylvester Impersonation Scene similar to Focker's father Sylvester impersonation  scene, Football huddle scene intercepted and tackled similar to Focker football huddle scene whereas Jack Brynes is intercepted  and tackled scene.  Indian  Dance Scene similar to Focker's  Indian dance scene. Truth Serum Scene - in where true feeling emerge similar Jack Brynes administering truth serum in where true feeling emerge,  Most importantly F-cker is prevalent throughout plaintiff's script referring to individuals in a comical aspect similar to Focker meaning one in the same in a comical aspect. Little Fockers referring  to children in a comical aspect similar Maid in Focker claiming the child is  a cute littler f-cker, Talk of first time sex and details at the table similar to  talk of first time sex and details in  the Focker house, The "prosthetic dolls" in which landlord believes feels real similar to  Jack Brynes believes the rubber booby feels real scene. Pornography video scenes similar to pornographic videos found in the Focker car. Sign Language Scene mimicking hands and mouth gestures in a perverted manner similar to Jack Brynes grandson - sign language mimicking hands and mouth in a perverted manner scene. Police upon a thorough investigation conclude that the allege victim was a perpetrator and sexual deviant similar to police upon a thorough investigation  conclude that the allege defendants are sexual deviants. The flicking of the badge scene explaining that he would have the Police officer walking the beat in the circus for the next ten years similar to  Jack Brynes flicking his badge and explaining  to the police officer that he would  be working in  a retirement home for the next   years. Painted Face Scene similar to Bernie Focker painting  his  face, Children referred to Little F-ckers in a comical aspect scene similar to house keeper making inference to  Jack Brynes grandson as a little fucker in a comical aspect, The incarceration scene similar to incarceration scene in Meet the Fockers, The Judge Connection Scene with the nephew scene similar to Bernie Focker having a judge connection. The truth serum scene in where true feeling emerge that lead up to an embarrassing moment similar to Fockers truth serum scene which lead to an  embarrassing moment. The pass out cold scene where he hits the floor similar to Focker out passes out drunk and hits the floor , The psychiatrist in her evaluation concludes that with guidance even the most stubborn could break the bonds of dysfunctionalism scene similar Roz claiming that Jack is stubborn and is crying out for a hug delving  into the foundation of his dysfunctional problem,  The Scene in where all families are dysfunctional in their own quirky ways  similar to Bernie Focker mentioning in  the RV that everyone has their issues. Square dance similar Do si do, The landlord spitting on the floor while talking similar to Rusty spitting on the floor while talking to  Gregg, Judge connection scene in where the attorney representing the defendants is the Judges nephew similar Judge connection in where Bernie Focker's wife has a connection with the Judge,  and many more Scenes. 

         NONE OF THESE SCENES ABOVE ARE INCORPORATED IN THE DISTORTED MEET THE PARENTS 1991 VHS VIDEO-CASSETTE THAT HAS TO BE FORENSICALLY EVALUATED.

******* THE 1991 MEET THE PARENTS  VIDEOCASSETTE OFFERED INTO EVIDENCE BY THE DEFENDANTS' IN THIS CASE HAD BEEN TAMPERED WITH BY AND THROUGH EMPLOYEES AT THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. THIS SAME TAMPERED EVIDENCE WAS ATTACHED AS AN EXHIBIT TO DEFENDANTS'  SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION.  

******* THIS NEW EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT WILL CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE THAT THE DEFENDANTS HAVE CONTINUED TO ACT CRIMINALLY THROUGHOUT THESE COURT PROCEEDINGS PERPETRATING FRAUDS ON  THE COURT AS WELL AS  THIS APPELLANT.   ANY REFERENCE TO DEFENDANTS' 1991 MEET THE PARENTS VIDEOCASSETTE FOUND IN A BLACK BOX  AT THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS THAT ALLEGEDLY HAD  "NO LABELS  ATTACHED"  HAS BEEN COMPROMISED.  THE CHAIN OF  EVIDENCE IN THESE PROCEEDINGS CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE CORRUPTION ON IT'S HIGHEST LEVEL. 

THE INTENTIONAL TAMPERING OF FEDERAL EVIDENCE PROVES THAT THE DEFENDANTS IN THIS CASE CONTINUE TO CONDUCT THEMSELVES  IN A CRIMINAL MANNER.      

          The employees at the Library of Congress to wit: Tracie Coleman and Richard D. Sharp certified documentation under oath stating that the 1991 MTP videocassette found in a black box at the Library of Congress had "no labels attached." However, upon an independent investigation and inspection of the alleged 1991 MTP videocassette at the Library of Congress ---- revealed that labels were "attached" the  60 minutes video label  had been manually crossed out and altered to reflect 72 minutes of video which is equivalent to 12 pages of added script....      This evidence if not tampered would have paved the way to  discovery however the defendants used the 2 certifications by the employees under oath as exhibits and the defendants' deceptively placed a new label over the minutes with the caption of the case confirming the  perjured statements under oath by Tracie Coleman and Richard D. Sharp.  At this point it is fair to say that the 1991 Meet the Parents is not credible and may had been planted by the defendants for the purpose of these proceedings to mask and subterfuge that the defendants' in this case have used the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" originally created by Joseph Ardito.
 
The OVERWHELMING : Characters, Scenes and Settings used from the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" originally created by Joseph Ardito are "INDISPUTABLE."  
  


"Meet the Parents" and "Meet the Fockers" are a product of Plaintiff's "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled, "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" this is indisputable.


The defendants in this case rely on "The Indisputable Documentary Evidence," of the 1991 ? "Meet the Parents" VHS video-cassette with "no written copyright." This VHS video-cassette was allegedly found in a black box at the Library of Congress with allegedly no markings and allegedly preceded this  Plaintiff's copyright by ? years. However, this story is a "Horror Flick" with a twist!

This evidence has been compromised altered and tampered with at the Library of Congress. It is fair to say that this evidence has been planted by the defendants. 


The 1991 distorted "Meet The Parents" video-cassette is narrated by a gas station attendant, the father is a retired gas station owner. The family is portrayed as an ordinary family until the end. A stick is thrown into a lake for the dog to fetch; the dog drowns. The one daughter commits suicide and is found swinging from a rope in her bedroom. The father comes down the steps on a shot gun spree accidentally killing his surviving daughter and wife. Shortly thereafter, the father supposedly dies of a heart attack. This film has all the makings of a horror movie because, everyone in the family including the dog dies a tragic death !


The End


This horrific sequel could not fit squarely into "Meet the Fockers" because everyone in the family including the dog is dead.  
     
  Sorry, did I say "This blockbuster of a Horror Flick had a sequel!

Who actually saw Meet the Parents in 1991 ? 


The alleged sequel was incorporated in this distorted 1991 Meet the Parents video-cassette with "no written copyright" that  was found in a black box at  the Library Of Congress. The stories alleged sequel is narrated by a gas station attendant as a male customer walks up to the counter  claiming to the gas station attendant that he is taking his children to the circus. The gas station attendant replies!  What you are taking your children to  the circus? Stop and go back! As he is about to elaborate on another  horrific story and chain of events in where the entire family will most likely resemble the same horrific ending in where  "Everyone in the family will die including  a dog if they have one."  Any reference to this movie as a comedy is inaccurate.  This was in fact the alleged sequel incorporated in the distorted MTP 1991 video-cassette that has to  be forensically evaluated.

    The distorted MTP 1991 (?)  VHS - Has "No Written Copyright" just the fact that it came in a black box with no labels. 

 

See: Jay Roach's in his Meet the Focker's commentaries who was in fact a Producer and the Director of both "Meet the Parents" and "Meet the Fockers." Jay Roach stated unequivocally we had a "great script" with layer upon layer (multi-faceted) in which many movies could be made and many movies were in fact made from the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" originally created and owned by Joseph Ardito. These "Stolen Federal  Copyrighted Materials" had started a trend in comedy and was used as a blueprint in numerous movies made by these defendants.   

                                            
MEET THE PARENTS 1991 (?) VHS VERSION:  Has  None of the following Scenes or Characters:

None of the Characters:

      No CIA Character, No Nurse Character, No Attorney Character, No Psychiatrist Character, No In-Laws Characters- cousins, Uncles, Aunts,  Characters, No Police Officer Character, No Doctor Characters, No Animal Shelter Character, No Senior Citizens, No Judge Connection, No Investigative Characters, No Bureau Child Welfare Agent, No Animal Shelter  Agent, No Concerned Neighbor Character, No Doctors, etc., etc. 

None of  the Scenes:

      No I'm Watching  You Scenes, No Lie Detector Test Scene, No Infrared Hidden Surveillance Camera Scenes, No Stun Gun Scene, No allegiance scenes = circle of trust, No Truth Serum Scene, No Scene where true feelings emerge from the truth serum Scene, No drunk pass out Scene, No Rules and Regulation Scenes, No peeking through the blinds with a cynical attitude scene as the car pulls into the driveway, No questioning the car Scene, No erratic driving Scene, No race home Scene, No shredded clothes Scene, No eviction scene, No airport Scene, No psychiatrist scenes or psychological evaluations scenes, No inside the aircraft Scene, No Interrogation Scene, No Investigative Scene, No lock up or incarceration Scene, No Prosthetic doll Scene or Mammary Gland Scene, No cop Scene, No Carpentry Scene, No Renovation Scene, No Cheap Bottle of Champagne Scene, No Karate Scenes, No first time talk of Sex Scene, No Dysfunctional or Rational method in bringing up Children Scene, No lock up Scenes or being carried off like a Raving Lunatic by Police while kicking arms and legs Scene, No being Restrained Scene, No Frayed Wire Scene, No Climbing up on the Roof Scene "taking off like a scared cat Scene, No Asian dialect Scene, No Southern Accent Scene or any type of accent Scene, No eviction Scene of shredded clothes, No painted face Scene, No referring to characters as f cker in a comical aspect, No little F cker referring to the child in a comical aspect Scene, No airport Scene, No Hidden Surveillance Camera Scene, No being viewed by the Hidden Surveillance Camera Scene, No Eavesdropping Scene, No listening on a Phone Extension Scene, No Michael Angelo of Carpentry Scene, No Elmer Fudd Impersonation Scene, No Sylvester Impersonation Scene, No Reference to the President Bill Clinton Scene, No Gay Ridicule Scenes, No Reference to the General Scene, No reference to possible Coup d'etat Scene these Scenes go hand in hand with the CIA Character, No CIA Character Scene, No Children Scene, No Senior Citizen Scene, No Sign Language Scene, No mimicking hand and mouth gesture Scene, No Red light District Scene, No Ridiculing Driving Scene, No In-Laws Scene, No Volleyball Scene in where a woman sustains injury to  her Nose Scene, No Skimpy Bathing Suit Scene, No hospital Scene where a baby is being born and the parents are cynical and apprehensive about the qualification of the staff member delivering the baby Scene,  No Square Dance Scene, No Tazer Gun Scene, No psychiatric evaluation Scenes, No talk about volts in relation to the tazer gun, stun gun when administering the voltage, No man fleeing from custody with a tranquilizer gun scene, No scene in where a psychiatrist tries to evaluate the problem, No scene in where the bonds of dysfunctionalism are broken, and many more scenes that only prove beyond any reasonable doubt that Meet the Parents and Meet the Fockers are a product of plaintiffs "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant."  

Furthermore,  "Absolutely" no sequel from this distorted 1991 Meet the Parents video-cassette could possibly fit squarely into "Meet the Fockers".
   

 

       On the other hand, Plaintiff's "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled, "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" Incorporate all these scenes and more. The "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" didn't need a sequel because the sequel was already incorporated into the original creation. The Tenant and/or  The Dysfunctionals would resume the sequel by "Meeting Another Dysfunctional Family." 

Whereas, the sequel for the alleged distorted 1991 (?) Meet the Parents video-cassette entails a totally different family - a father taking his children to the circus where they will all be massacred.

It is fair to say that whatever portions of the Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials the defendants didn't unlawfully use in "Meet the Parents" they unlawfully used in Meet The Fockers " and so forth in other movies.

Meet the Parents" and "Meet the Fockers" are undoubtedly a  product of Plaintiff's "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" originally created and owned by Joseph Ardito.

 

     Again, in further proving Plaintiff's position, the Plaintiff's sequel for "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" was already incorporated in Plaintiff's 1996-1998 "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials." The sequel's story for "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" was for the Tenant to "Meet Another Dysfunctional Family" which squarely fits into "Meet the Fockers", a 2004? copyright!  - unlawfully stolen by the defendants-respondents and unlawfully used. "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" fit sequel fits so perfectly ?  Because it's the Plaintiff's original creation!  Whatever "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" the defendants-respondents didn't use in "Meet the Parents, they used in "Meet the Fockers, Wedding Crashers and other movies !!!!!!

 

The sole use of Gregg Glienna and Mary Ruth Clarke's VHS distorted video-cassette of 1991(?) "Meet the Parents" was  to  deceptively mask, conceal and subterfuge that the defendants acted in concert with premeditation and intent and knew at all times that they were unlawfully using plaintiff's  "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" owned and  originally created by Joseph Ardito and  unlawfully used these "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials in the making of defendants-respondents' projects entitled "Meet the Parents", "Meet the Fockers", "Wedding Crashers" and "other movies" in the industry.

It is abundantly clear in this case that the defendants-respondents have unlawfully pawned off the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" off as their own original creation.

This criminal conduct is outrageous and will only undermine the publics' perception of justice in relation to these defendants-respondents that have acted with unconscionable with premeditation, malice and  ill-will. These defendants-respondents' have a moral obligation not only to this plaintiff, but to the public at large. The defendants' sophisticated "Organized Crime Syndicate" in this case believe that they are above the law due to  political connections, corruption and the fact that they own and used the media in a distorted manner to subterfuge their criminal conduct.


The decisions in this case are being appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. 
 
The plaintiff's case deals with "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" however, this plaintiff was precluded from "discovery" by the court.  Discovery is a constitutional right and was a crucial factor in this case because "discovery" would have revealed the "Organized Crime Syndicate" involved in the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials."  entitled "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant"

Any impartial jury in the world or in any foreign court would conclude that "Meet the Parents" and "Meet the Fockers" are undoubtedly the product of plaintiff's "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Dysfunctionals and or The Tenant."  

Justice should be Impartial and Fair to all Litigants because it will only reflect on the Judicial Branch of Government and undermine the public's perception of Justice. 

 

The Wedding Crashers
This Plaintiff is cognizant of the fact that litigation concerning The Wedding Crashers has already been petitioned in the California Courts. An investigation concerning this lawsuit is now being conducted. This Plaintiff's scripts were stolen, as well as various project outlines, entitled "The Attorneys" - The outline encompasses the following scenes: The Attorneys Actually Crashed Wedding Scene, The Sympathy Routine Scene, The Hog Tied Scene, The Gay Scene, The Boat Scene, The Closet Queer Scene, The Football Scene, The Man Punched in the Stomach and Doubles up on the Floor Scene, The Virgin Scene, The Wink of Accomplishment Scene, The Fake Tears in Attempt to Entice the Woman Scene, Drinking from the Pitcher Scene, Eating Like Animals Scene - where you can actually see the food tumbling in their mouths while talking and spitting food all over the floor, The Painter Scene, Man in Closet Scene, The Minister Scene, Changing Names Scene - where they fabricate stories and occupations as to where they become unrecognizable and make it difficult to track them down, Cognito Scene, Nunchuks Scene, Ma Make the Meatballs Scene, The 4 Day Weekend Excursion Trip that Would Turn out to be a Weekend in Ecstasy Scene, The Kind Man Scene, The Laxative Put Into a Drink Scene, The Dysfunctional Family Scene and many more Scenes.


Website powered by Network Solutions®